If 198 Pieces of Unsolicited, (Possibly) Ungoogleable Advice for Investors Were Not Enough

yoda, advice, wisdom

Having been to a number of talks and panels, my biggest frustration with these occasions is when a moderator asks a VC: “So what do you invest in?”

And the VC would respond, “Good people, good markets.” Or “Ambitious founders tackling ambitious problems.” Or some cousin of it. Well, of course. I’m not saying they’re wrong, but no venture capitalist ever says, “I want to invest in bad people building in bad markets.” It’s the kind of advice and “insight” that’s equivalent to a large company saying their company culture is a “family.” Not wrong, but tells me nothing about what you actually want. The same is true for most advice for investors. And well, advice in the investing world is given quite liberally, without liability and responsibility most of the time.

So I made it a mission to collect pieces of advice that were actually tactical or differentiated. Advice that would make you turn your heads and actually pay attention. And under the right circumstances, actually useful. It’s why I wrote this blogpost’s predecessors:

This is the third one in this 99 series for investors. And, if by chance, you’re a founder reading this, to understand the mentality of a differentiated investor, you might also like the 99 series for founders. But I digress.

In no particular order other than the chronological order I found them, below is the third set of 99 pieces of advice for investors:

  1. Investing – Deal flow, theses, diligence
  2. Fundraising from LPs
  3. Fund strategy/portfolio construction/exiting
  4. Fund structure
  5. Portfolio support
  6. Governance/managing LPs
  7. Building a team
  8. Compensation
  9. Miscellaneous

Investing – Deal flow, theses, diligence

1/ “Any company that is pure execution risk without any market risk is not a suitable venture investment.” โ€” Chris Paik

2/ “[In the private markets,] I don’t think we’ve seen a 70% write down yet or 70% of these [private companies] worth less than the cash [they’ve spent to date].” Take public market comparables. To see how much public companies are worth as a function of the money they’ve spent to date, look at the “Cumulative Retained Earnings” (which tells you how much money they’ve burnt over their lifetime) compared to the “Enterprise Value” (or market cap minus the cash they have today). If their enterprise value is less than their cumulative retained earnings, that means they’re worth less than the money they’ve spent to date. โ€” David Friedberg (timestamped 4/21/2023, when he said there are 70% of public companies that are worth less than the cash they’ve spent to date, but we haven’t seen a 70% haircut to private market valuations)

3/ The first best use of any consumer product is crime. โ€” Pre-seed VC

4/ When looking for outliers, “Invest in companies that canโ€™t be described in a single sentence.” โ€” Chris Paik

5/ “Venture investing process as a two-stage process โ€“ the first where you ensure you avoid false negatives โ€“ that is, you ensure that there are no errors of omission, where you unwittingly pass on meeting a potential winner. The second stage is where you avoid a false positive or errors of commission, that is, picking the wrong company.” โ€” Sajith Pai quoting Karthik Reddy

6/ How a lawyer diligences AI companies:

  • “How are you using AI? Is it a third-party? Let’s see those terms, contracts, etc.
  • How are you using customer data? Prior agreements? Prior policies in place? Subsequent policies in place? You could lose the data, the models, and the algorithms. If found in violation by the FTC. States privacy laws like Texas, California, and Virginia also should be looked at.”

7/ “When it’s cooler to be in a startup than in a band, we’re at the top of the market.” โ€” A fund of funds General Partner

8/ “Buy when there is blood in the streets, and sell when there are trumpets in the air.” โ€” A Warren Buffett attribution

9/ Does this founder have 20 years of experience of 20 one-year experiences? Depth vs breadth. Which does the industry/problem they’re building for require?

10/ While there is no one “right” way to run a partnership meeting, beware of conviction-led deals (as opposed to consensus-driven), since partners are incentivized to go into sales mode to convince the rest of the partnership and may make it harder for them to see the flaws in the deal.

11/ In early stage venture, debates on price is a lagging indicator of conviction, or more so, lack thereof.

  • Price also matters a lot more for big funds than small funds.
  • Price also matters more for Series B+ funds.
  • Will caveat that thereโ€™s an ocean of difference between $10M and $25M valuation. But itโ€™s semantics between $10M and $12M valuation. How big your slice of the pie is doesnโ€™t matter if the pie doesnโ€™t grow.
  • Not saying that itโ€™s correlated, but it does remind me of a Kissinger quote: โ€œThe reason that university politics is so vicious is because stakes are so small.โ€

12/ โ€œJudge me on how good my good ideas are, not how bad my bad ideas are.โ€ โ€” Ben Affleck when writing Good Will Hunting. A lot of being a VC is like that.

13/ We like to cite the power law a lot. Where 20% of our investments account for 80% of our returns. But if we were to apply that line of thinking two more times. Aka 4% (20 x 20%) of our investments account for 64% of our returns. Then 0.8% account for 51.2% of our returns. If you really think about it, if you invest in 100 companies, we see in a lot of great portfolios where a single investment return more than 50% of the historical returns.

14/ “Early-stage investing is NOT about mitigating the possibility of failure Itโ€™s about discounting the probability of an outsized outcome – what is the size and likelihood of a HUGE win Investing in โ€œsafeโ€ companies due to fear of failure is the surest way to a mediocre returns.” โ€” Rick Zullo

15/ โ€œ[David Marquardt] said, โ€˜You know what? Youโ€™re a well-trained institutional investor. And your decision was precisely right and exactly wrong.โ€™ And sometimes that happens. In this business, sometimes good decisions have bad outcomes and bad decisions have good outcomes.โ€ โ€” Chris Douvos

16/ When calling a reference and asking about someone’s weakness, “If you were to hire someone under that person, what would be the top traits you’d look for?”

17/ Give founders a blank P&L statement. Tell them that is not their P&L statement; it is their customer’s. And ask them where do they/their product sit on their customer’s P&L statement. Those who are aware of who they are and who they need to sell to do better than those who don’t.

18/ No one has a crystal ball. Well, the pessimists do. They’re right 90% of the time.

19/ “I want the guy who understands his limitations instead of the guy who doesn’t. On the other hand, I’ve learned something terribly important in life. I learned that from Howard Owens. And you know what he used to say? Never underestimate the man who overestimates himself.” โ€” Charlie Munger

20/ “Instead of saying, ‘This risk exists,’ we reframe the risk and ask, ‘What do I have to believe for this to work?’ Doing this transforms risk from a source of fear and unknown into a set of clear assumptions to be systematically tested and de-risked.” For example, โ€œWe have to believe we can scale the hardware to XYZ performance metric by ABC date. What are the key engineering constraints bottlenecking that?โ€ โ€” Mike Annunziata

21/ Questions to ask investee (on-list and off-list) references by Graham Duncan:

  • How would you describe Jane to someone who doesnโ€™t know her?
  • Whatโ€™s your sample size of people in the role in which you knew Jane?
  • Who was the best person at this role that youโ€™ve ever seen?
  • If we call that person a โ€œ100โ€, the gold standard, whereโ€™s Jane right now on a 1-100?
  • Does she remind you of anyone else you know?
  • If Janeโ€™s number comes up on your caller ID, what does your brain anticipate sheโ€™s going to be calling about? Whatโ€™s the feeling?
  • Three attributes I like to keep in mind are someoneโ€™s hunger, their humility, and how smart they are about people.  If you were to force rank those for Jane from what she exhibits the most to least, how would you rank them?
  • What motivates Jane at this stage of her life?
  • If you were coaching Jane, how would you help her take her game up?
  • If you were going to hire someone to complement Jane doing the same activity (NOT a different role), what would they be good at to offset Janeโ€™s strengths and weaknesses?
  • How strong is your endorsement of Jane on a 1-10? (If they answer 7, say actually sorry 7s are not allowed, 6 or 8?  If the answer is an 8, โ€œWhat is in that two points?โ€)

22/ โ€œNeutral references are worse than negative references.โ€ โ€” Kelli Fontaine

23/ “If someone brags about their success or happiness, assume itโ€™s half what they claim. If someone downplays their success or happiness, assume itโ€™s double what they claim.” โ€” George Mack

24/ “Historians now recognize the Roman Empire fell in 476 – but it wasn’t acknowledged by Roman society until many generations later. If you wait for the media to inform you, you’ll either be wrong or too late.” โ€” George Mack

25/ “Joe Rogan and Warren Buffett are both entrepreneurs. But if you switched them, both businesses would fail. Rule of thumb: If a word is so broad that you can’t switch 2 things it describes, it needs unbundling.” โ€” George Mack

26/ Are the founders at the same stage on the Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs? If not, how have they come to terms with different motivations outside of the scope of the venture itself?

27/ $100K contracts take about 70 days to close. So a founder becomes interesting if they figure out how to close faster. โ€” Gong State of Revenue Growth 2025 report

28/ Beware of “annual curiosity revenue.” “AI companies with quick early ARR growth can lead to false positives as many are seeing massive churn rates.” โ€” Samir Kaji

29/ Data suggests that “never following on” beats “always following on” 63% of the time. “Outperformance for the typical portfolio is 12% better when you don’t follow on (3.52X vs 3.14X).” โ€” Abe Othman

30/ “A successful reserve strategy depends both the chance of picking winners and the step up value at the next round. The stock price multiple * the probably of receiving funding = 1.” If the product of your variables is more than one, you should focus primarily on increasing your check size and ownership at entry. And as such, fewer to no reserves. If you’re below one, you’re better off with more reserves. โ€” Clint Korver

31/ Be aware of “seed-strapping” among AI startups. Your SAFEs may never convert. “Watch for any revisions to *YC’s* SAFE or *YC’s* side letter (note: YC has a secret SAFE and side letter documentation not available on on their website, so careful with conclusions).” โ€” Chris Harvey

32/ In underwriting AI companies in 2025, ARR and run rate are no longer signal. Instead, look at sales efficiency (how long it takes you to implement your product; if you charge more or double the price, will customers still buy your product?), the cost to acquire that revenue, and net dollar retention (gross churn, land and expand). โ€” Nina Achadjian

33/ “The ‘raise very little’ strategy only works if you’re in a market that most people believe (incorrectly) is tiny or unimportant. If other people are paying attention, you have to beat the next guy.” โ€” Parker Conrad

34/ Instead of asking founders/references what are their weaknesses, ask for 2-3 positive words that describe them and 2-3 positive words that DO NOT describe them.

35/ โ€œYou want to be pre-narrative. You want to position your capital in an area where the supply of capital increases over time and where those assets will be traded at a premium.โ€ โ€” Albert Azout

36/ “For Hard Tech companies, the only metric that matters before Series B is the ‘Speed of Hiring Impressive People’, aka the ‘SHIP’ rate.” โ€” Mike Annunziata

37/ Beware of co-CEOs and founders who used to be VCs where their past firm isn’t investing. โ€” Sriram Krishnan

38/ “If you donโ€™t pay great people internally, then youโ€™re a price taker.โ€ โ€” Ashby Monk

39/ โ€œBuying junk at a discount is still junk.โ€ โ€” Abe Finkelstein

40/ โ€œWhat do you do when you donโ€™t know anything, you havenโ€™t met anybody, you have no context, the human brain starts inventing rationale.โ€ โ€” Narayan Chowdhury

41/ โ€œThe bigger you get, the more established you get, the more underwriting emphasis goes into how this team operates as a structure rather than is there a star?โ€ โ€” Matt Curtolo

42/ โ€œPrice reflects the inefficiencies of the market.โ€ โ€” Albert Azout

43/ โ€œYou want to be pre-narrative. You want to position your capital in an area where the supply of capital increases over time and where those assets will be traded at a premium.โ€ โ€” Albert Azout

44/ โ€œWe donโ€™t want a slow no. A slow no is bad for everybody.โ€ โ€” Sean Warrington

45/ “Todayโ€™s world is unpredictable, and this is as stable as it will ever be again.” โ€” Seth Godin

46/ “Alfred is the worst e-commerce investor at Sequoia as he knows too much & I am the best biotech investor at Sequoia as I know nothing about biology.” โ€” Roelof Botha, quoted by Finn Murphy

47/ “Since the job is not about simple pattern-matching but about finding true outliers, seniority and experience don’t guarantee success.” โ€” Ian Park

48/ As your fund size grows, do be wary of investing in competing portfolio companies. While it’s always been a tradition in venture to not to, times may be changing. Be sure to be transparent and know how to separate church and state. “This is an issue where the business model for funds is at odds with what most founders want.” Ways you can do so. By Charles Hudson.

  • “Use a seed fund or scout strategy to meet as many promising, early-stage companies as you can.
  • “Focus on investing in Series A and Series B (instead of seed) rounds and pay up to get into the winners when itโ€™s clear which companies are working.
  • “Buy secondary positions in the companies that matter but that you missed.
  • “Invest in competitors but have different investors take board seats and create firewalls to limit information spillover.”

49/ โ€œI deeply subscribe to, โ€˜Thereโ€™s always another train leaving the station.โ€™โ€ โ€” Wendy Li

50/ โ€œAlphaโ€™s three things: information asymmetry, access, and, actually, taxes.โ€ โ€” Vijen Patel

51/ The worst mistake you can make as an early-stage investor is to believe you’re the smartest person in the room.

Fundraising from LPs

52/ “If you’re at 75-80% committed and then you say there’s a single close, that will drive urgency. If you’re at 10 to 30 to 40% committed, and you say there’s a single close, you have no catalyzing power. There’s just so much dirt to hoe. When I went out, when people would ask, ‘When are you closing?’ I would say, ‘We will close on this particular date and ideally it will be a single close. And here is where I am. I’ve closed X% of the pipeline and the total value of the pipe of interested investors was this amount of money.’ The goal was to show with a relatively small conversion rate, I could get to a single close.” โ€” Tomasz Tunguz

53/ What to prepare for the due diligence questionnaire (DDQ) with institutional LPs. โ€” Chris Harvey

  • Governance & Oversight
    • GP Removal Process
    • GP Conflicts of Interest Disclosures
    • GP Devotion of Time
    • Fiduciary Duties Owed by GP
    • Decision-Making Processes
    • LPAC Roles & Responsibilities
    • LP Reporting Guidelines
    • Deadlock Resolution (2 or 4 person GPs)
  • Economic & Tax Terms
    • Affiliated LPs (0 fees to GP team)
    • Capital Calls (Schedule/L. fees/Interest)
    • Distribution Waterfall
    • Fund Expenses/Cap vs. Mgmt Fees
    • Special Tax (ERISA, ECI, FATCA, etc)
    • Subscription Lines
    • Mandatory Tax Dist.
    • Warehoused Assets (QSBS)
  • Regulatory Compliance
    • IA ยงยง203, 206โ€”Code of Ethics, P2P, etc
    • CFIUS Compliance
    • VC & Private Fund Limitsโ€”ยง203(l)/(m)
    • NQI/Qualifying Investments (<20%)
    • Warehoused Investments (VC)
    • State ERA rules <$25M AUM
    • Look-through Rules & Beneficial Ownershipโ€”ยง3(c)(1)
  • Operations & Admin
    • Trademark Rights/IP
    • Vesting Schedules
    • Principal Office Location
    • List of Fund Assets + SPVs
    • Comp Policy for GP and Team
    • Verification of GP Track Record
    • Cybersecurity & Risk Management
    • Service Providers (Fund Admin, Ops, Tax, Legal)

54/ What Minal Hasan includes in the fund diligence room (specifically for Fund IIs)

  • Primary materials
    • Due Diligence Questionnaire
    • Pitch Deck
    • Appendix to Pitch Deck
    • Detailed Investment Thesis & Strategy
    • Term Sheet
    • LPA
    • Subscription Agreement
  • Legal
    • Incorporation Documents for LP, GP, and MC
    • Entity Org Chart
  • Team
    • Team Bios
    • Prior Partner Investment Performance
    • Hiring Plan
    • List of Advisors
    • List of References
    • List of Co-investors
    • List of Service Providers
  • Portfolio
    • One-pager on each company
    • Deal Pipeline
  • Governance
    • Board/Board Observer Seats
    • Policies
    • Sample Investment Memos
    • Sample Quarterly Report
    • Sample Capital Account Statement
    • Sample Capital Call Notice
    • Sample Distribution Notice
  • Financial Docs
    • Budget
    • IRR Spreadsheet
    • IRR Benchmarking
    • IRR Letter certified by accountant
  • Marketing
    • Press mentions
    • Authored thought leadership

55/ When fundraising, don’t share which other LPs you’re talking to. Even if LPs ask who you’re talking to. Unless money is in the bank, nothing counts. Tell the other LPs that you have non-disclosures with all your other LPs, but that you have a lot of interest. If you share the marquee names, the other LPs’ will base their decision on the closing of those LPs. If they commit, great. If not, it will materially impact how the new LPs view your fund.

56/ When working with overseas LPs, you should ask for their citizenship, where their capital is domiciled at, and who is the ultimate beneficial owner if not the person you are pitching? This would help you navigate CFIUS rules and knowing who you’re actually bringing on board.

57/ You should ask prospective overseas LPs what their citizenship is and who the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) is, if not the person you are talking to, as you are doing diligence on your prospective LPs.

58/ โ€œGoing to see accounts before budgets are set helps get your brand and your story in the mind of the budget setter. In the case of the US, budgets are set in January and July, depending on the fiscal year. In the case of Japan, budgets are set at the end of March, early April. To get into the budget for Tokyo, you gotta be working with the client in the fall to get them ready to do it for the next fiscal year. [For] Korea, the budgets are set in January, but they donโ€™t really get executed on till the first of April. So thereโ€™s time in there where you can work on those things. The same thing is true with Europe. A lot of budgets are mid-year. So you develop some understanding of patterns. You need to give yourself, for better or worse if youโ€™re raising money, two to three years of relationship-building with clients.โ€ โ€” David York

59/ โ€œGetting an LP is like pulling a weight with a string of thread. If you pull too hard, the string snaps. If you donโ€™t pull hard enough, you donโ€™t pull the weight at all. Itโ€™s this very careful balancing act of moving people along in a process.โ€ โ€” Dan Stolar

60/ “Things that break the rules have a bigger threshold to overcome to grab the reader’s attention, but once they do, they tend to have a stronger, and more dedicated following. Blandness tends to get fewer dedicated followers.” โ€” Brandon Sanderson on creative writing, but applies just as well to pitches

61/ In all great stories, the protagonist (in the case of a pitch, you) is proactive, capable, and relatable. Your pitch needs to show all three, but at the minimum two out of the three. โ€” Brandon Sanderson

62/ โ€œData rooms are where fund-raising processes go to die.โ€ Prioritize in-person and live conversations. When your investor asks you for documents, ask for 15 minutes on their calendar so you can “best prepare” the information they want. If they aren’t willing to give you that 15 minutes, you’ve lost the deal already. โ€” Mark Suster

63/ “Funds can start with a private offering, then move to 506(c) after the prior offering is completed without a waiting periodโ€”new Rule 152(b) allows for a quick switch, you just can’t do them at the same time or start with Rule 506(c) then move to 506(b).” โ€” Chris Harvey

64/ “Set your own agenda or someone else will.” โ€” Melinda Gates

65/ To address key person risk if the GP, or one of the GPs, has a debilitating health condition within the fund term, include the below in the LPA, by Shahrukh Khan:
Each Key Person shall, as a condition to their designation, represent and covenant to the Partners [inclusive of the GP and LPs] that, to the best of their knowledge, they are not currently experiencing any medical condition reasonably expected to materially impair their ability to perform their duties over the Term [usually 10-12 years] of the Fund.
If, during the Investment Period [when the fund is actively making investments], a Key Person is diagnosed with or undergoes treatment for a condition that materially impacts their ability to fulfill their responsibilities, the General Partner shall promptly disclose to the Limited Partners that a Health-Related Key Person Event [we could define this broadly] has occurred. The specifics of the health condition need not be disclosed [maybe except to the LPAC if there is one?].
Upon such notification, the Investment Period will be suspended and cannot continue without the express approval of the Limited Partners. [I feel like this could mean that no new investments can be made until LPs review and vote on whether to proceed with the fundโ€™s activities in light of the health-related situation.]

66/ When asking LPs what they invest in, sometimes what they don’t invest in is more helpful than what they say they invest in. Most LPs are trained to be generalists โ€” by sector, by stage, by asset class โ€” so asking what they do invest in often nets an answer like “We invest in everything” or “We only invest in the best,” which are often less helpful tells when you’re trying to figure out if you’re a good fit for them or not.

67/ If you have a 3(c)(1) fund, “if an investor owns >10% of your fund, the SEC’s look-through rule requires you to count ALL underlying beneficial owners toward your 100-investor limit.” The workaround is you create a side letter for large LPs that includes this statement: “The Investor’s Capital Commitment shall equal the lesser of [check size] or 10% of total fund commitments.” โ€” Chris Harvey

68/ At your AGM, talk about categories of VCs you admire. For instance, “inception funds” or “superscale funds.” And the logos you admire in each category. Then show the funds that actually follow after your capital. This builds rapport with your LPs and that you’re not just shooting from the hip, where it “just so happens” that some random awesome fund follows your capital. Inspired by Gil Dibner.

69/ “If an LP isnโ€™t following up with an ask for the data room, refs and lays out a path to a potential next meeting, then itโ€™s a pass. Hint โ€” donโ€™t offer the dataroom. I always say yes.” โ€” Endowment Eddie

70/ “[LPs] are underwriting your ability to create signal under uncertainty. If your fund slide canโ€™t do that, your deck is already leaking trust.” โ€” Thorsten Claus

71/ โ€œIโ€™m not here to tell you about Jesus. You already know about Jesus. He either lives in your heart or he doesnโ€™t.โ€ โ€” Don Draper in Mad Men

72/ On GPs answering questions on operational excellenceโ€ฆ โ€œThe best answer I could ask from a GP is for them to be super honest and say, โ€˜These are the people Iโ€™ve leaned on to help me understand what best practices look like.โ€™โ€ โ€” Nicky Sugarman

73/ When reporting numbers, it’s helpful to have more than one TVPI number. One number should represent last round valuation prices. Another should be the number you believe is authentic to you, which likely includes some companies that have been proactively written down and revenue multiples that reflect where the company is currently at. Nevertheless, always explain your rationale as to why.

74/ When you’re fundraising from institutions, expect “27 months from first meeting to wire, 4.7% of prospects commit,” and “annual costs [of] $2.1M+ in infrastructure.” โ€” Pavel Prata

75/ โ€œSpeed to fundraise does not always equate to a strong investor.โ€ โ€” Lisa Cawley

Fund strategy / portfolio construction / exiting

76/ If you have a follow-on strategy or a reserve strategy, track your “follow-on MOIC.” Return hurdles are 10x MOIC for initial capital. And 4-5x MOIC for follow-on capital. The more you invest in follow on, the less TVPI you’ll have. “If you’re going from pre-seed to seed, you’re tracking to a 5x MOIC. If you’re going from a seed to Series A, that goes down to 3x.” โ€” Anubhav Srivastava (timestamped Apr 7, 2023)

77/ The reasons Fund Iโ€™s and IIโ€™s outperform are likely:

  • Chips on shoulders mean they hustle more to find the best deals. They have to search where big funds arenโ€™t or come in sooner than big funds do.
  • Small fund size is easier to return than a larger fund size.
  • Rarely do they have ownership targets (nor do they need significant ownership to return the fund). Meaning theyโ€™re collaborative and friendly on the cap table, aka with most other investors, especially big lead investors.
  • Price matters less. Big funds really have to play the price game a little bit more since (1) likely to be investing in multiple stages with reserves, and price matters more past the Series A than before, and (2) theyโ€™re constrained by check size, ownership targets, and therefore price in order to still have a fund returner.

78/ “Strategy is choosing what not to do.” โ€” Peter Rahal

79/ “We expect GPs to have 1% ownership for every $10M in fund size.” โ€” Large multi-billion family office

80/ โ€œExiting a position in a company to return DPI to LPs is not a reflection of your stance on the company, but your stance on the market.โ€ โ€” Asher Siddiqui

81/ If you have more than $10M and are not a solo GP, consider separating your GP and management company entities. While there are about $5000-10,000 in costs per year, separating fund structures allows for more optimal tax planning, better liability protection, continuity across GP entities with future funds, and flexibility to adopt W2 employment for future employees which is hard to do under a partnership structure. โ€” Chris Harvey

82/ If you’re a GP at a large fund making >$1-2M in annual fees, consider two metrics: (a) AUM times management fee divided by number of GPs, and (b) NPV of potential future carry on that AUM divided by number of GPs. You never want (a) to be greater than (b).

83/ “Just because I have a front row seat at a championships [basketball game] doesn’t mean I can coach an NBA team.” โ€” Brian Chesky

84/ โ€œThe thing about working with self-motivated people and driven people, on their worst day, they are pushing themselves very hard and your job is to reduce the stress in that conversation.โ€ โ€” Nakul Mandan

85/ “The median value-add is about zero. The mean is less than zero. Most things work because they just work (right set of users wanted something at the right time) and the executive team builds the right culture to hire a great team to operate in that market, not because of what a VC does. Value-added service is ‘product as marketing’ for 90% of investors who pitch it.” โ€” Kanyi Maqubela

86/ Get access to as many different offices of your portfolio company’s potential customers as possible. Even better if you know them so well, they give you their office keys. โ€” John Gleeson

87/ “I find most meetings are best scheduled for 15-20 minutes, or 2 hours.  The default of 1 hour is usually wrong, and leads to a lot of wasted time.” โ€” Sam Altman

88/ โ€œProcess drives repeatability.โ€ โ€” Andy Weissman

89/ If you don’t know what to ask your LPAC, ask about extensions on fund length (i.e. past 10+2 years), exceeding limits on company concentration and recycling, investing in startups across funds, and early DPI. โ€” Hunter Walk

90/ At the annual summit… “When you speak on market/themes, I donโ€™t want to hear from the managing partners. Bring out your young guns and the members of the team who are your ground game/first line.” โ€” Endowment Eddie

91/ After the third extension to a fund, control and decision usually shifts from GPs and LPAC to general LP base consent. 93% of LPAs allow for at least 2 years of an extension. โ€” Runjhun Kudaisya, Natalia Kubik, Brian O’Neill, Thomas Howard (Goodwin)

  • “First extension: 63% of funds surveyed allow GPs to authorize the first extension at its sole discretion, typically for one year.
  • Second extension: 42% of funds surveyed require approval from the LPAC to authorize the second extension.
  • Third extension: 41% of funds surveyed require consent from the fund investors to authorize the third extension. Note that further extensions can always be approved by an amendment to the fund documents, but this would require consent from at least 50% and usually 75% of investors by commitment or interest.”

92/ โ€œToo many calls I get on, itโ€™s a re-hash of what the strategy is. Assume if Iโ€™m taking the call, I actually spent five minutes reminding myself of who you are and what you do.โ€ โ€” Chris Douvos

93/ โ€œOne thing I hate is when I meet with someone, they tell me about A, B, and C. And then the next time I meet with them, itโ€™s companies D, E, and F. โ€˜What happened to A, B, and C?โ€™ So Iโ€™ve told people, โ€˜Hey, weโ€™re having serious conversations. Help me understand the arc.โ€™ As LPs, we get snapshots in time, but what I want is enough snapshots of the whole scene to create a movie of you, like one of those picture books that you can flip. I want to see the evolution. I want to know about the hypotheses that didnโ€™t work.โ€ โ€” Chris Douvos

94/ โ€œEvery letter seems to say portfolios have โ€˜limited exposure to tariffs.โ€™ The reality is weโ€™re seeing potentially the breakdown of the entire post-war Bretton Woods system. And thatโ€™s going to have radical impacts on everything across the entire economy. So to say โ€˜we have limited exposure to tariffsโ€™ is one thing, but what they really are saying is โ€˜we donโ€™t understand the exposure we have to the broader economy as a whole.โ€™โ€ โ€” Chris Douvos

95/ “Bad performance is explainable, but operational failures erode trust and your LPs aren’t going to re-up.” โ€” Liz Ferry

96/ “You canโ€™t exceed one associate per partner and expect those associates to have real influence.” โ€” Mike Dauber

97/ โ€œScaling is not synonymous with increasing fund size. To me, scaling means youโ€™re increasing in sophistication. Youโ€™re increasing in focus. And thatโ€™s really a sign of maturity and fund size is a byproduct of that.โ€ โ€” Lisa Cawley

98/ In a 2024 survey, in regards to junior team members’ compensation, “AUM matters less than you think.” There’s only a 17% pay bump on base pay for associates between $1.5B funds and $156M funds. In addition, levers that can boost a GP’s take-home pay include GP staking and cashless contributions. โ€” Chris Harvey, with reference to Deedy Das and Venture5 Media

99/ โ€œNever sit alone at lunch.โ€ โ€” Alan Patricof

Photo by Emmanuel Denier on Unsplash


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

Gratitude and Deal Flow

thank you, gratitude

A few months ago, my good friend Sam hosted a happy hour for LPs, which he invited me to. There I caught up with a former fund-of-funds (FoF) manager who has booked some of the most impressive returns I’ve ever heard of for a pure FoF play. For context, more than one fund generated over 15X net distributions to their LPs. The numbers were enough to impress me. But I had to ask: “Across all the funds you were a part of, what is something that you look for that you’re reasonably confident others don’t?”

He said two things, but one stood out. “Gratitude. I look for managers who never forget who put them in business.”

In all honesty, I found that odd. Not because I disagreed. I love folks who recognize and are grateful to the people who got them to where they are today. But because it didn’t occur to me that it should be the top two things one should optimize for when picking managers. Naturally, it kept gnawing at me.

In my own experience, gratitude seems to compound. Grateful individuals thank you often and sometimes when you least expect it, and more often than not, assuming you’ve done real work to help them, they compliment behind your back. The people they talk to end up learning about you. Their teammates learn about you. And you’ve earned multiple occasions to meet their teammates and those close to them. When a GP or founder’s teammates leave and start new things, those people often think to call you first.

Grateful GPs often hire talent who are just as humble, and in turn, as second nature, extend their appreciation often. Those same GPs are more likely to invest in people who have similar traits as well. So, it begins this flywheel.

As an LP, I look for emerging GPs whose network and deal flow compounds over time. That the first moment I meet them is the smallest network they will ever have again. So I expect and underwrite a GP’s ability to compound deal flow over time. So Fund n+1 is better than Fund n, and Fund n+2 is exponentially better than Fund n. Gratitude is one way GPs can increase the surface area for serendipity to stick. For there to be more quality inbound opportunities in the future.

Photo by Jonny Gios on Unsplash


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

Why I Don’t Pay for LinkedIn Premium

ruler, short

โ€œI didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.โ€ โ€” Mark Twain

I write on this blog because I can write to think. I can write as a stream of consciousness. But at the same time, it is just that. It’s long.

But when it comes to reaching out and getting a stranger’s attention, there’s beauty in brevity. 200 characters. If you can’t get the attention of someone you don’t know in 200 characters. Hell, even 100 characters. Then no pitch deck, no long blurb ever will. Just because a house has more square footage doesn’t mean you’ll stop and visit the house.

People are busy. Investors are busy. Recruiters are busy. The world’s smartest, brightest, most ambitious are busy. A great cold message can go further than almost any warm intro can. Most people are just not good at writing them. They’re too verbose. (Caveat, a lot of my outreaches are too, but I highlight the 20 words they need to pay attention to in that email. And they may not all be in the same sentence.)

To be fair, LinkedIn Premium is really the Trojan Horse for this short piece. Keep exercising the cold outreach muscle.

I still do it every week. And so far, the response rates to ones I handcraft are better than what AI can write for me. The platform of outreach may vary. Question I always think about is where are the people I’m reaching out to spending a lot of attention, but there’s just that slight deficit of inbound information. Sometimes, it’s literally a messenger pigeon.

Photo by William Warby on Unsplash


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

How to Increase Dialogue with your LPs | El Pack w/ Kelli Fontaine | Superclusters

kelli fontaine

Kelli Fontaine from Cendana Capital joins David on El Pack to answer your questions on how to build a venture capital fund. We bring on three GPs at VC funds to ask three different questions.

The Council’s Amber Illig asked what happens when a solo GP is incapacitated or passes away.

Oceans Ventures’ Steven Rosenblatt asked why most LPs follow the decision-making of other LPs.

NeuCo Academy’s Jonathan Ting asked what LPs think about GPs asking for help.

From investing in great fund managers to data to investor relations, Kelli Fontaine is a partner at Cendana Capital, a fund of funds whoโ€™s solely focused on the best pre-seed and seed funds with over 2 billion under management and includes the likes of Forerunner, Founder Collective, Lerer Hippeau, Uncork, Susa Ventures and more. Kelli comes from the world of data, and has been a founder, marketing expert, and an advisor to founders since 2010.

You can find Kelli on her socials here:
X/Twitter: https://x.com/kells_bells
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kellitrent/

And huge thanks to Amber, Steven, and Jonathan for joining us on the show!

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcastsย andย Spotify. You can alsoย watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[01:26] Kelli’s new data discoveries
[04:32] How did Kelli underwrite a manager with no LinkedIn?
[06:19] Is too much data ever a problem?
[08:18] Vintage year benchmarking
[09:49] Telltale signs on GPs’ social profiles
[10:57] Data Kelli wishes she could collect
[15:59] Enter Amber and her new podcast
[18:08] Amber’s background and The Council
[19:08] How does Amber define top companies?
[24:25] How can a solo GP set the firm up well in case they’re no longer there?
[26:11] Kelli’s number one fear with solo GPs
[28:30] Best practices for generational transfers
[32:28] Solo GPs and their future plans
[36:51] Enter Steven and Oceans
[42:38] Would Kelli ever include AI summaries as part of the get-to-know-someone phase?
[44:18] Why do LPs follow other LP’s decision-making?
[48:43] What are the traits of an LP who is likely to have independent thinking?
[51:16] Why don’t LPs talk directly with founders?
[57:59] Enter Jonathan and NeuCo Academy
[1:00:05] Is Kelli seeing more secondaries firms?
[1:01:56] How often should GPs lean on LPs for help?
[1:07:22] Are most LPs helpful?
[1:12:21] What kinds of questions does Kelli get from her own GPs?
[1:15:39] Kelli’s last piece of advice

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

โ€œIf that fund deployed over a year versus a manager of ours that deployed over four years, theyโ€™re going to look very different. So we do vintage-year benchmarking to see how their MOIC stacks up against how the revenue of companies stack up.โ€ โ€“ Kelli Fontaine

โ€œTeam risk is the biggest risk in venture.โ€ โ€“ Kelli Fontaine

โ€œThe same top ten firms are not the same that they were 15 years ago, and probably Silicon Valley. Generational transfer is very hard.โ€ โ€“ Kelli Fontaine

โ€œIf you make the brand bigger than just you that it comes from DNA, support systems, things that you stand for that have had support to get thereโ€”so once that brand is made, the other team members embody that brand as well. Thatโ€™s the way to do it. Itโ€™s really empowering other team members to own a part in that brand-buildingโ€”outwardly and inwardly in decision-making.โ€ โ€“ Kelli Fontaine


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

81% of America is Underfunded | Vijen Patel & Grady Buchanan | Superclusters | S5PSE1

vijen patel, grady buchanan

โ€œ19% of our GDP attracts about 55% of capital inflows, aka venture activity, and 81% is underinvested.โ€ โ€“ Vijen Patel

We’re back with one of our crowd favorite formats, where we bring on one LP and one GP, and share why that LP invested in this GP. This time, we have Grady Buchanan, co-founder of NVNG, and Vijen Patel, founding partner of The 81 Collection.

Vijen Patel is an entrepreneur and investor. He founded The 81 Collection, a high growth equity firm in boring industries. Previously, he founded what is now known as Tide Cleaners. He bootstrapped what eventually became the largest dry cleaner in the country (1,200 locations) before selling to Procter & Gamble in 2018. Before Tide Cleaners, he worked in private equity, McKinsey & Company, and Goldman Sachs. He lives in Chicago with his wife and two kids.

You can find Vijen on his socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vijenpatel/
X / Twitter: https://x.com/itsvijen

Grady Buchanan is an institutional and risk-based asset allocation professional with a passion for bringing venture capital to those who have the interest. He founded NVNG in late 2019 and oversees investment strategies, the firmโ€™s venture fund pipeline, manager sourcing, due diligence, and external events. Before launching NVNG, Grady worked with the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundationโ€™s (WARF) $3B investment portfolio, focused on private equity and venture capital initiatives, including fund diligence, investment strategy, and policy. Grady is based in Milwaukee, WI.

You can find Grady on his socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gradynvng/
X / Twitter: https://x.com/GradyBuchanan

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcastsย andย Spotify. You can alsoย watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[02:41] The pressure of quitting a PE job for dry cleaning
[05:09] Vijen’s self talk as a founder
[06:50] How to overcome doubt
[09:00] How Vijen learned customer success
[10:35] What did Pressbox become?
[12:41] The dichotomy between society’s needs and what gets funded
[14:19] How did Grady go from selling pancakes to being an LP?
[23:51] Why did Grady think he bombed the LP interview?
[29:15] What is The 81 Collection?
[32:22] How did Vijen meet Grady?
[34:39] How is Vijen fluent in Spanish?
[36:40] How did Grady meet Vijen?
[42:21] How did Grady underwrite 81 Collection?
[44:44] What about Vijen made Grady hesitate?
[48:35] What’s one thing about 81 Collection that could’ve gone wrong?
[50:33] The 3 things that create alpha
[52:42] Why does NVNG have the coolest fund of funds’ names?
[53:47] The legacy Grady plans to leave behind
[56:06] The legacy Vijen plans to leave behind

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

โ€œI wrote down everyoneโ€™s concerns, and I just sat on it. A lot of the founders we like to work with, the ones who we really love are the ones who take it in and listen, write it down, then take some time to synthesize everything and then theyโ€™ll act with conviction. โ€˜Why is this stupid? Tell me why. Letโ€™s go deeper and deeper.โ€™ And oftentimes these reasons are very rational and slowly over time, what if I derisk this by doing that?โ€ โ€“ Vijen Patel

โ€œ19% of our GDP attracts about 55% of capital inflows, aka venture activity, and 81% is underinvested.โ€ โ€“ Vijen Patel

โ€œThereโ€™s this crazy stat we recall often: the 50 richest families on Earth, who often build in this 81, theyโ€™ve held, on average, their business for 44 years.โ€ โ€“ Vijen Patel

โ€œWe invest in only amazing managers; we will not invest in every amazing manager.โ€ โ€“ Grady Buchanan

โ€œAlphaโ€™s three things: information asymmetry, access, and, actually, taxes.โ€ โ€“ Vijen Patel


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

How Many Exceptions Are Too Many? | El Pack w/ John Felix | Superclusters

john felix

Pattern Ventures’ John Felix joins David on El Pack to answer your questions on how to build a venture capital fund. We bring on three GPs at VC funds to ask three different questions.

Atria Ventures’ Chris Leiter asked about the common mistakes LPs make when underwriting solo GPs.

Garuda Ventures’ Arpan Punyani asked how quickly do most LPs get to conviction. First 10 minutes? First meeting?

Geek Ventures’ Ihar Mahaniok asked how LPs evaluate Fund IIs when the Fund I has no distributions.

John Felix is a General Partner and Head of Research at Pattern Ventures, a specialized fund of funds focused on backing the best small venture managers. Prior to Pattern, John served as the Head of Emerging Managers at Allocate where he was an early employee and helped to launch Allocate’s emerging manager platform. Prior to joining Allocate, John worked at Bowdoin College’s Office of Investments, helping to invest the $2.8 billion endowment across all asset classes, focusing on venture capital. Prior to Bowdoin, John worked at Edgehill Endowment Partners, a $2 billion boutique OCIO. At Edgehill, John was responsible for building out the firm’s venture capital portfolio, sourcing and leading all venture fund commitments. John started his career at Washington University’s Investment Management Company as a member of the small investment team responsible for managing the university’s now $13 billion endowment. John graduated from Washington University in St. Louis with a BSBA in Finance and Entrepreneurship.

You can find John on his socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnfelix12/
Twitter: https://x.com/johnfelix123

And huge thanks to Chris, Arpan, and Ihar for joining us on the show!

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcastsย andย Spotify. You can alsoย watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[02:20] What’s changed for John since our last recording?
[04:08] What is Pattern Ventures?
[06:22] Why is Pattern’s cutoff for funds they’re interested in at $50M?
[07:32] How does John define noise?
[09:34] Do non-sexy industries require larger seed funds?
[11:36] How does think about overlap in the underlying startup portfolio?
[15:22] Enter Chris and Atria Ventures
[18:03] Should solo GPs scale past themselves?
[24:14] Partnerships have more risk than solo GPs
[26:10] How does John think about spinouts from large VC firms?
[27:53] The psychology of being a partner at a big firm versus your own
[30:38] Enter Arpan and Garuda Ventures
[31:26] Geoguessr
[32:52] Garuda’s podcast, Brick by Brick
[34:52] How quickly do LPs know they intuitively want to invest in a GP?
[38:02] The analogy to what GPs do to founders
[43:50] There are many ways to make money
[44:57] Quantifying intuition as an investor
[49:12] Enter Ihar and Geek Ventures
[49:36] How do LPs evaluate Fund IIs when Fund I has no DPI?
[53:01] How do you know if a GP did what they said they were going to do?
[54:47] What if the key value driver is off-thesis, but everything else is on-thesis?
[56:21] Is signing 1 uncapped SAFE per fund reasonable?
[57:14] What is the allowable percentage of exceptions in a fund?
[1:01:32] Good vs bad exceptions
[1:06:06] Reminders that we are in the good old days
[1:07:31] John’s last piece of advice to new allocators
[1:09:00] David’s favorite moment from John’s last episode

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

โ€œIn life, itโ€™s always easy to justify โ€˜why nowโ€™ is not the right time. I think itโ€™s hard to justify โ€˜why nowโ€™ is the right time to do something.โ€ โ€“ John Felix

โ€œWe love investing in things that are contrarian and non-consensus, but there has to be a path to becoming consensus because something canโ€™t remain non-consensus forever. There has to be a catalyst that the market eventually realizes this or else the companyโ€™s not going to be able to raise venture capital. Itโ€™s not going to be able to sustain it and continue to grow and survive.โ€ โ€“ John Felix

โ€œThe type of spinouts we want to back are the people who are successful in spite of working at the big brand, not because they worked at the big brand.โ€ โ€“ John Felix

โ€œYou need to earn the right to start your new firm to do your own thing. I donโ€™t think enough people realize that.โ€ โ€“ John Felix


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

How to Boost Engagement: Proven LP Relationship Building Techniques

A while back, my friend Augustine, CEO and founder of Digify, asked me to write something for his company, Digifyโ€™s blog, about how I think about maintaining relationships between fundraising cycles when I was still an investor relations professional. As such, I wrote a mini two-part series on the frameworks and tactics I use to maintain LP relationships. Been given the liberty to cross-post on this humble blog of mine, in hopes that it helps any emerging managers or IR professionals here.

Voila, two of two! The first one you can find here (also linked below).


Authorโ€™s note: My promise to you is that weโ€™ll share advice youโ€™ve likely never heard before. By the time you get to the end of this article, if youโ€™re intimidated, then weโ€™ll have done our job. Because thatโ€™s just how much it takes to fight in the same arena as people Iโ€™ve personally admired over the years and work to emulate and iterate daily. That said, this wonโ€™t be comprehensive, but a compilation of N of 1 practices that hopefully serve as tools in your toolkit. As such, we will be separating this piece into Part 1 and 2. The first of which is about overarching frameworks that govern how I think about managing relationships. The second of which focuses on tactical elements governed by the initial frameworks brought up.

You can find the first piece of two here.

Itโ€™s easy to stay high-level and strategic. I wonโ€™t. I personally find it helpful to have tactical examples on how to execute frameworks on LP relationship management. As your mileage may vary, the below will hopefully serve as tools for the toolkit, as opposed to Commandments or the Constitution for investor relations practices.

In general, people who help create a product have more mental and emotional buy-in to the continued success of said product. Itโ€™s why influencers leverage their fanbase to generate new ideas for content. Itโ€™s why laws and propositions are voted on. Itโ€™s why your parents asked what you wanted for dinner. Itโ€™s why, if you’re a junior team member and want budget and resources for your project, you ask for feedback from leadership (often). While not every LP wants to be intimately involved in the day-to-day, and even if they donโ€™t end up helping, it still goes a long way when you ask for their feedback and advice for major firm decisions, regardless of whether theyโ€™re on the LPAC or not. Building strong LP relationships requires making them feel like true partners in the decision-making process. They want to be involved in:

  • Hiring/promoting a new partner or GP
  • Pivoting or expanding fund strategy
  • Increasing the length of the deployment period or fund term
  • Generating early DPI
  • Breaking a partnership

LPs want to hear news before they become news. And if time and expertise allows, theyโ€™d like to write the press release with you.

In addition, if you have the bandwidth and resources, host events with them on topic areas theyโ€™re interested in. Even if itโ€™s a small gathering of four to six people, itโ€™s the intentionality and the willingness that counts.

I think a lot about Ebbinghausโ€™ Forgetting Curve. Effectively, how long does it take someone to forget new information and as a function, how often do you need to remind someone for them to retain memory of that new piece of information? Within an hour, the average person forgets half of what they learned. Within 24 hours, the average person forgets 70% of it. And within a week, they forget 90%. I wonโ€™t get too technical here, but if you are interested in learning more, I highly recommend reading this paper: Murre and Drosโ€™ Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghausโ€™ Forgetting Curve.

And so, in theory, every time someoneโ€™s memory of you, of your thesis, or of your firm drops below 90% memory retention, you should remind them. Rough intervals of which are within minutes, within 2 hours, within a day, within a week, within 30 days, and so on. In practice, after you catch up with an LP, text them a note saying that youโ€™ll follow up within the day. And yes, texts are often far more effective in maintaining relationships with LPs than emails. Emails are read by other team members and often lost in inboxes. The only exception to this rule is if you or your LP is an RIA, and requires all communication to be archived, including text.

Outside of scheduled catchups, spend a lot of time tracking peopleโ€™s hobbies and interests in your CRM, and sending LPs an article, video, interview or insight that reminded you of them or that you think theyโ€™d genuinely appreciate; it goes a long way. Oh, and sending thank you notes more often than you think you need to, especially unprompted ones, really helps cement relationships. Over time, this will become a habit. Hereโ€™s an example of an email I send often:

Hey [name],

Read this article [link article] this morning as I was grabbing my morning coffee and it reminded me of our conversation half a year back on [insert topic you were talking about].

One of my favorite lines from the piece was [insert quote from the article] โ€“ something I thought you would really get a kick out of.

I know youโ€™re busy, so thereโ€™s no need to reply to this email, but I want to send this your way in case it’s interesting for you, as well as send you good vibes on this beautiful Tuesday.

Keep staying awesome,

David

Two things here:

  1. You do not have to write like me.
  2. Telling people that they donโ€™t have to reply is more likely to result in a reply. Works for me 80-90% of the time when sending to a warm connection. Though, your mileage may vary.

When I had Felipe Valencia from Veronorte on my podcast, he mentioned that he brought Colombian coffee for GPs whenever he visited the States. I also know of IR people and GPs who do the same for LPs. And vice versa from LPs to Heads of IR and GPs, especially from our Asian counterparts, where gifting culture is more common. Do note though that if your LP is from a public institutionโ€”sovereign wealth fund, pension, endowment, or sometimes, even a large corporationโ€”individuals are not allowed to accept gifts more than $50, or sometimes none at all.

One of my favorite lessons from Top Tier Capitalโ€™s co-founder, David York, was on when to see LPs as a function of budgetary cycles.

โ€œGoing to see accounts before budgets are set helps get your brand and your story in the mind of the budget setter. In the case of the US, budgets are set in January and July, depending on the fiscal year. In the case of Japan, budgets are set at the end of March, early April. To get into the budget for Tokyo, you gotta be working with the client in the fall to get them ready to do it for the next fiscal year. [For] Korea, the budgets are set in January, but they donโ€™t really get executed until the first of April. So thereโ€™s time in there where you can work on those things. The same thing is true with Europe. A lot of budgets are mid-year. So you develop some understanding of patterns. You need to give yourself, for better or worse if youโ€™re raising money, two to three years of relationship-building with clients.โ€

Knowing the timing of when to see who is important, especially these days when youโ€™re required to meet and build relationships across the world. Strategic timing can make or break an LP relationship, particularly when it comes to securing allocations.

While the above are usually for pensions, corporates and sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, and large family offices all have recurring cycles. And meeting a few months before the ball has to roll can mean the difference between you being a line item somewhere and being on top of the docket.

I first learned of this when tuning into a Reid Hoffman and Brian Chesky interview, which I highly recommend. It was further reinforced as I spent more time learning from people in the hospitality and culinary world.

To summarize, everyone knows what a 1- to 5-star experience looks and feels like. But when everyone is optimizing on a 5-point scale, to outcompete others, you must compete on a scale they have yet to conceptualize. And so a five out of five experience is one where you leave happy and content enough to leave a glowing review because all the boxes were checked. Everything in your ideal vacation, retreat, or dining experience was fulfilled. Soโ€ฆ if thatโ€™s the new baseline, then what does a six out of five experience look like?

Maybe thatโ€™s sending a limo to pick someone up at the airport, so they donโ€™t have to find their own way to the establishment. That could also be finding your guestโ€™s favorite bottle of champagne and having it ready when they enter your premises.

So, if thatโ€™s a six out of five, what does a seven out of five look like? Youโ€™ve pre-booked everything your guest is interested in before they show up and without them having to lift a finger. Or you learned that on their entire NY trip, your diners never had the chance to try an original New York hot dog from a street vendor, so you replace one course of the menu just so that they can try it. (True story. Would highly recommend reading Will Guidaraโ€™s Unreasonable Hospitality.)

So, if thatโ€™s a seven-star experience, what does an eight look like? What about a nine-star? 10-star? 11-star?

At some point, the stakes get quite insane. Meeting their role model from the history books. Using time travel or teleportation devices. Meeting aliens. But trust me, if competitive sports taught me anything, itโ€™s that itโ€™s good to envision the impossible as possible. And, the most important part to envision in this entire exercise is the genuine, and unstoppable smile that appears.

So what does this look like in practice? I cannot list everything out there, because itโ€™s 1. not possible, and 2. if I can spell out a true 7- or 8-star experience, itโ€™s generalizable. And if it is, it wonโ€™t feel special. That said, let me list out some Iโ€™ve done in the past that hopefully serve as inspiration. Caveat, Iโ€™m a Bay Area native, and I still live in the Bay Area.

  • An LP tells me theyโ€™re coming to visit the Bay. I send them a suggested itinerary based on the number of days theyโ€™re here, which balances both work and some under-the-radar touristy things. On top of that, I send hotels I suggest, restaurants I recommend, and more. All of which I offer to call on their behalf because I know the staff there and I might be able to get them a discounted rate or an automatic upgrade.
  • If I recommend a restaurant, and they agree to host a meeting there or just to try it out, I call the restaurant, tell them that theyโ€™re really important people to me (can do so if Iโ€™m a regular patron there already), and on top of that, I ask them to give the guests a kitchen tour.
  • I ask a local chocolatier to custom make some bonbons for me that are inspired by the individuals visiting, that I give to the LPs when I meet them in person.
  • If itโ€™s a rush order, I call one of the long-established fortune cookie shops in San Francisco for them to do a custom order and write custom fortunes inside each fortune cookie. And inside each fortune is a fun fact about each person Iโ€™ve introduced them to meet while theyโ€™re here.
  • When it comes to intros, 70% of my intros will be relevant to their business interests. Startups. VCs. Other LPs. 20% of my intros are my recommendation of who they should meet but might not know they should. 10% are 1-2 people I think extremely highly of who are outside of technology and startups, but will offer a fascinating perspective to the world. A YouTuber with millions of subscribers. A legendary restaurateur. A lead game designer. An author. A Nobel prize winning professor. Naturally, I do the last selectively. My job is also to protect their bandwidth. For the last set of intros, I also donโ€™t take intro requests.

All-in-all, LPs, like the rest of us, are human. Weโ€™re emotional creatures. We love stories. We are naturally curious. We love wonder. Their job doesnโ€™t always allow for them to be, especially with tons of back-to-back diligence meetings, conversations with stakeholders, and so on. So it makes me personally really happy when I can balance suspense and surprise when I help them craft trips to the Bay.

These are just a few strategies and tactics among many. The goal with this piece was never to be exhaustive, but to inspire possibilities and your favorite practices. And if youโ€™re willing, I, as well as the Digify team, are always all ears about practices youโ€™ve come to appreciate and build into your own routine. Until the next time, keep staying awesome!


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


Any views expressed on this blog are mine and mine alone. They are not a representation of values held by On Deck, DECODE, or any other entity I am or have been associated with. They are for informational and entertainment purposes only. None of this is legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Please do your own diligence before investing in startups and consult your own adviser before making any investments.

Uncompensated Risks in VC | Wendy Li | Superclusters | S5E12

wendy li

โ€œItโ€™s not the probability; itโ€™s the consequence. Itโ€™s not the probability when something goes wrong. Itโ€™s the consequence when it goes wrong.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

Wendy Li is the co-founder and Chief Investment Officer at Ivy Invest, a fintech investment platform bringing an endowment-style portfolio to everyday investors.

Before Ivy Invest, Wendy was Managing Director of Investments at the Mother Cabrini Health Foundation, where she built the Investment Office from the ground up and managed a $4 billion portfolio. Prior to Mother Cabrini Health Foundation, Wendy was Director of Investments at UJA-Federation, investing across a broad range of asset classes. Wendy began her career in the Investment Office at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Columbia University and is a CFA charterholder.

You can find Wendy on her socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wendy-li-cfa/
X / Twitter: https://x.com/askwendyli

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcastsย andย Spotify. You can alsoย watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[02:29] Wendy’s family’s history with Columbia University
[07:55] The importance of understanding family history
[11:09] Why Wendy chose to work at The Met
[15:16] How did Wendy know in the interview that Lauren would be her mentor?
[19:18] Specialist vs generalist in 2006
[22:58] Pros and cons of using AI as an LP
[29:02] The 80-20 rule for how an LP thinks
[29:29] The one mistake EVERY SINGLE LP makes
[33:27] What is the Takahashi-Alexander model?
[39:38] Who do you learn from when your LP institution is so small?
[41:22] The wisdom of an open-sourced LP reading list
[45:34] What is headline risk?
[47:09] What does ‘uncompensated risk’ mean?
[50:20] Why now for ‘endowment-in-a-box’
[55:07] Wendy’s proudest dish from her mom’s recipe book
[57:09] Wendy’s last piece of advice

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

โ€œWhere [using AI] is a challenge and can present a challenge to somebodyโ€™s development is in the utilization of these tools where perhaps thereโ€™s not an innate understanding of why the data is important.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

โ€œThe pattern of mistakes that I certainly made and I saw the others makeโ€”and I know those listening and are earlier in their investor journeyโ€”will inevitably make-… We all make it. Even knowing this is a trap that we all fall intoโ€ฆ even though they are all going to be aware of this trap, theyโ€™re still going to make the same mistake because we all do it, but we all have to learn this one and develop our own scar tissue on this one. Itโ€™s the exciting investment manager that other really smart LPs are invested with that is a โ€˜hard-to-accessโ€™ manager โ€“ that has a window in which they will take your capital. And thereโ€™s this sense of urgency. Sometimes real, sometimes forced. And thereโ€™s this sense that all these really smart investors are doing this thing. And the added layer on the endowment foundation side is oftentimes that thereโ€™s an investment committee member who is super excited about the investment becauseโ€”and Iโ€™ll use a real quote that someone once said to me, โ€˜It would be a trophy manager to have in the portfolioโ€™โ€”and that is invariably a mistake that we all make in our investment careers. I would say that when I have been regretful of avoidable mistakes, it has had that pattern.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

โ€œI deeply subscribe to, โ€˜Thereโ€™s always another train leaving the station.โ€™โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

โ€œThereโ€™s a great risk in being overconfident. Thereโ€™s a great risk in assuming a normal distribution of events and returns.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

โ€œItโ€™s not the probability; itโ€™s the consequence. Itโ€™s not the probability when something goes wrong. Itโ€™s the consequence when it goes wrong.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li

โ€œIn-the-moment decision-making is always harder than you might remember post-mortem.โ€ โ€“ Wendy Li


Follow David Zhou for more Superclusters content:
For podcast show notes: https://superclusters.co/superclusters
Follow David Zhou’s blog: https://superclusters.co
Follow Superclusters on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SuperclustersLP
Follow Superclusters on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@super.clusters
Follow Superclusters on Instagram: https://instagram.com/super.clusters


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

LP Relationship Management: The 2 Frameworks You Need to Build Trust

A while back, my friend Augustine, CEO and founder of Digify, asked me to write something for his company, Digify’s blog, about how I think about maintaining relationships between fundraising cycles when I was still an investor relations professional. As such, I wrote a mini two-part series on the frameworks and tactics I use to maintain LP relationships. Been given the liberty to cross-post on this humble blog of mine, in hopes that it helps any emerging managers or IR professionals here.

Voila, the first of two!


Authorโ€™s note [aka me]: My promise to you is that weโ€™ll share advice youโ€™ve likely never heard before. By the time you get to the end of this article, if youโ€™re intimidated, then weโ€™ll have done our job. Because thatโ€™s just how much it takes to fight in the same arena as people Iโ€™ve personally admired over the years and work to emulate and iterate daily. That said, this wonโ€™t be comprehensive, but a compilation of N of 1 practices that hopefully serve as tools in your toolkit. As such, we will be separating this piece into Part 1 and 2. The first of which is about overarching frameworks that govern how I think about managing relationships. The second of which focuses on tactical elements governed by the initial frameworks brought up.

One of the best pieces of advice I got when I started as an investor relations professional was that you never want your first conversation with an allocator to be an ask. To be fair, this piece of advice extends to all areas of life. You never want your long-anticipated catch up with a childhood friend to be about asking for a job. You never want the first interaction with an event sponsor to be one where they force you to subscribe to their product. Similarly, you never want your first meeting with an LP to be one where you ask for money.

And in my years of being both an allocator and the Head of IR (as well as in co-building a community of IR professionals), this extends across regions, across asset classes, and across archetypes of LPs.

So, this begs the question, how do you build and, more importantly, retain rapport with LPs outside of fundraising cycles? The foundation of any successful LP relationship lies in consistent engagement beyond capital asks.

To set the context and before we get into the tactics (i.e. what structured variables to track in your CRM, how often to engage LPs, AGM best practices, etc.), letโ€™s start with two frameworks:

  1. Three hats on the ball
  2. Scientists, celebrities, and magicians

This is something I learned from Rick Zullo, founding partner of Equal Ventures. The saying itself takes its origin from American football. (Yes, I get it; Iโ€™m an Americano). And I also realize that football means something completely different for everyone based outside of our stars and stripes. The sport Iโ€™m talking about is the one where big muscular dudes run at each other at full force, fighting over a ball shaped like an olive pit. And in this sport, the one thing you learn is that the play isnโ€™t dead unless you have at least three people over the person running the ball. One isnโ€™t enough. Two leaves things to chance. Three is the gamechanger.

The same is true when building relationships with LPs. You should always know at least three people at the institutions that are backing you. You never know when your primary champion will retire, switch roles, go on maternity leave, leave on sabbatical, or get stung by a bee and go into anaphylactic shock. Yes, all the above have happened to people I know. Plus, having more people rooting for you is always good.

Institutions often have high employee turnover rates. CIOs and Heads of Investment cycle through every 7-8 years, if not less. And even if the headcount doesnโ€™t change, LPs, by definition, are generalists. They need to play in multiple asset classes. And venture is the smallest of the small asset classes. It often gets the least attention.

So, having multiple champions root for you and remind each other of something forgotten outside of the deal room helps immensely. Your brand is what people say about you when youโ€™re not in the room. Remind people why they love you. And remind as many as possible, as often as possible. This multi-touch approach is essential for nurturing a robust LP relationship strategy.

My buddy Ian Park told me this when I first became an IR professional. โ€œIn IR, there are product specialists and there are relationship managers. Figure out which youโ€™re better at and lean into it.โ€ Since then, heโ€™s luckily also put it into writing. In essence, as an IR professional, youโ€™re either really good at building and maintaining relationships or can teach people about the firm, the craft, the thesis, the portfolio, and the decisions behind them.

To caveat โ€˜relationship managers,โ€™ I believe there are two kinds: sales and customer success. Sales is really capital formation. How do you build (as opposed to maintain) relationships? How do you win strangers over? This is a topic for another day. For now, weโ€™ll focus on โ€˜customer successโ€™ later in this piece.

Thereโ€™s also this equation that I hear a number of Heads of IR and Chief Development Officers use.

track record X differentiation / complexity

I donโ€™t know the origin, but I first heard it from my friends at General Catalyst, so Iโ€™ll give them the kudos here.

Everyone at the firm should play a key role influencing at least one of these variables. The operations and portfolio support team should focus on differentiation. The investment partners focus on the track record. Us IR folks focus on complexity. And yes, everyone does help everyone else with their variables as well.

That said, to transpose Ianโ€™s framework to this function, the relationship managers primarily focus on reducing the size of the denominator. Help LPs understand what could be complex about your firm through regular catchupsโ€”these touchpoints are crucial for maintaining a strong LP relationship:

  • Why are you increasing the fund size?
  • Why are you diversifying the thesis?
  • How do you address key person risk?
  • Why are you expanding to new asset classes?
  • Are you on an American or European waterfall distribution structure?
  • Why are you missing an independent management company?
  • Who will be the GP if the current one gets hit by a bus?

The product specialists split time between the numerator and the denominator. They spend intimate time in the partnership meetings, and might potentially be involved in the investment committee. Oftentimes, I see product specialists either actively building their own angel track record and/or working their way to become full-time investment partners.

One of my favorite laws of magic by one of my favorite authors, Brandon Sanderson, is his first law: โ€œAn authorโ€™s ability to solve conflict with magic is directly proportional to how well the reader understands said magic.โ€

In turn, an IR professionalโ€™s ability to get an LP to re-up is directly proportional to how well the LP understands said magic at the firm.

My friend and former Broadway playwright, Michael Roderick, once said, the modern professional specializes in three ways:

  1. The scientist is wired for process. The subject-matter expert. They thrive on the details, the small nuances most others would overlook. They will discover things that revolutionize how the industry works. The passionately curious.
  2. The celebrity. They thrive on building and maintaining relationships. And their superpower is that they can make others feel like celebrities.
  3. The magician thrives on novelty. Looking at old things in new ways โ€“ new perspectives. The translator. Theyโ€™re great at making things click. Turning arcane, esoteric knowledge into something your grandma gets.

The product specialists are the scientists. The relationship managers are the celebrities. But every IR professional, especially as you grow, needs to be a magician.

Going back to the fact that most LPs are generalists, and that most venture firms look extremely similar to each other, you need to be able to describe the magic and your firmโ€™s โ€˜rulesโ€™ for said magic to your grandma.

For the next half, Iโ€™ll share some individual tactics Iโ€™ve worked into my rotation. Most are not original in nature, but borrowed, inspired, and co-created with fellow IR professionals.


This post was first shared on Digify’s blog, which you can find here.


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


Any views expressed on this blog are mine and mine alone. They are not a representation of values held by On Deck, DECODE, or any other entity I am or have been associated with. They are for informational and entertainment purposes only. None of this is legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Please do your own diligence before investing in startups and consult your own adviser before making any investments.

The Inside Peek Into How Family Offices Gather | Samira Salman | Superclusters | S5E11

samira salman

โ€œThe revenue and economic models for groups are misaligned with how human nature functions.โ€ โ€“ Samira Salman

Samira Salman is a generational forceโ€”a rare blend of financier, strategist, and connectorโ€”revered for her ability to move capital, catalyze ventures, and cultivate the kinds of high-trust relationships that shape industries and define legacies. With over $5.5 billion in closed transactions spanning multiple asset classes, she is not merely a dealmakerโ€”she is a trusted consigliere to some of the worldโ€™s most sophisticated families, investors, and visionaries.

Samira is the Founder & CEO of Salman Solutions, a bespoke advisory firm, and the visionary behind Collaboration Circle, an invitation-only global ecosystem recognized by Fortune Magazine as the premier โ€œby families, for familiesโ€ platformโ€”curating aligned capital, deal flow, and meaningful connection across generations of wealth. She also serves as Chief Operating Officer of a private single-family office, overseeing a portfolio that blends venture capital, direct investments, and multi-generational governance.

Educated as a mergers and acquisitions tax attorney, Samiraโ€™s early career at Arthur Andersen, Deloitte, KPMG, and Shell Oil laid the foundation for her structural brilliance and financial fluency. She holds an LL.M. in Taxation, a JD, and a BS in International Trade and Financeโ€”with a minor in Economics. Her legal acumen, combined with a deep intuition for human behavior, gives her a unique edge in structuring elegant, effective solutions that drive growth, mitigate risk, and unlock hidden value.

Samiraโ€™s proprietary methodology for business growth and ecosystem development has positioned her as one of the most connected and trusted figures in private finance. Her work spans advisory mandates, capital formation, co-investment syndication, family office strategy, and the orchestration of transformational events for UHNW families and industry trailblazers. She is the rare operator who bridges worldsโ€”money and meaning, structure and soul, intellect and instinct.

Her multicultural upbringing and global exposure across dozens of countries have imbued her with a refined sensibility, cultural fluency, and a fierce commitment to authenticity. Samira doesnโ€™t just build businessesโ€”she builds trust-based systems that endure. Her work is rooted in the principle that Relationships Under Management (RUM) are the new AUMโ€”and she is the embodiment of that thesis.

A passionate advocate for womenโ€™s economic empowerment, arts and culture, and global impact, Samira has served as an Honorary Advisor to the United Nations for Social Impact Projects and the NGO Committee on Sustainable Development. She has held board roles with numerous arts, education, healthcare, and professional institutions including the Houston Ballet, Center for Contemporary Craft, and Fresh Arts.

You can find Samira on her socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/samirasalman/
X / Twitter: https://x.com/samira_salman

Listen to the episode onย Apple Podcastsย andย Spotify. You can alsoย watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[02:27] How did Samira find herself at TASIS?
[04:17] How did TASIS feel when she first arrived?
[07:27] From tax lawyer to family offices
[09:55] How did Samira decide to quit being a lawyer?
[17:12] Why did Samira want to be a tax lawyer?
[19:44] Journaling
[22:39] The blessing of a lawyer brain
[25:19] The Oprah episode that changed it all
[29:45] How did Salman Solutions start?
[33:28] Samira’s first interaction with family offices
[36:43] Show and tell with Samira’s journals and pens
[41:27] What did Samira mean that most family offices fall short of raising their own capital?
[42:54] What is the common family office hero arc into VC?
[44:05] Family office trends that Samira’s seen
[47:17] The starting point for families interested in VC
[50:13] Advice to a friend who wants to invest in VC
[53:31] Book, podcast and conference recommendations
[55:42] How does one qualify for Collaboration Circle?
[56:21] Content recommendations, continued
[59:57] How Collaboration Circle started
[1:06:59] The 3 pieces of Collaboration Circle
[1:09:49] Community economic models and human nature misalignment
[1:12:43] How to create safe environments
[1:18:02] The Dior bag tradition
[1:21:20] Reminders that we’re in the good old days

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

โ€œThe very first thing everybody has to do is give themselves permission to lean into what they are interested in and what does it for them and what they understand and what they have an affinity for, regardless of what everybody else says you should be doing.โ€ โ€“ Samira Salman

โ€œNever doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.โ€ โ€“ Margaret Mead

โ€œThe revenue and economic models for groups are misaligned with how human nature functions.โ€ โ€“ Samira Salman

โ€œNumbers and volume are not what programs humans to feel safe and to be authentic and to create. In order for us to do our best work and be our most thoughtful, our most creative, we have to be fully dropped down into our bodies and safe in our nervous systems. And some of the environments our industry has curated are literally the exact opposite of that.โ€ โ€“ Samira Salman


Follow David Zhou for more Superclusters content:
For podcast show notes: https://superclusters.co/superclusters
Follow David Zhou’s blog: https://superclusters.co
Follow Superclusters on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SuperclustersLP
Follow Superclusters on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@super.clusters
Follow Superclusters on Instagram: https://instagram.com/super.clusters


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.